Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
Hence each percent uncertainty in total count translates into almost one year uncertainty in the date by which the population grows past a given threshold.
Experimental error for solar distillation and ginger drying is also evaluated in terms of percent uncertainty.
Farmers expect, and settle for, twenty to forty percent uncertainty with these crops.
Note that the level of zero percent uncertainty is set to be the second grid line from the center of the chart.
As noted from Fig. 6, the lower uncertainties in the EEF are located in the IRI dimension in the higher E-region (107.7 and 110.3 km), where changes in the slope are near the level of zero percent uncertainty.
This indicates that the wide range of possible biomass values was not solely a function of extrapolation. Figure 1 Percent uncertainty by diameter at breast height (DBH) class and approach.
B. The prediction envelopes, displayed as percent uncertainty (half the width of the prediction envelope expressed as a percentage of the midpoint at each DBH class) for total live-tree C, Pseudotsuga menziesii, by approach for positive correlation only.
In general, using negative correlation assumptions halved the average percent uncertainty.
For Pseudotsuga menziesii, using approach 2, average percent uncertainty over the 3 to 66 cm DBH range was 38% for positive correlation, but this was reduced to 23% with negative correlation.
Similar(2)
The BEF h IPCC) and V 1 are obtained from independent samples (separate surveys), therefore, the uncertainty (percent SE) of W h IPCC) can be computed as in Eq. 21 [30,31,39,58,59,62,67]: SE%=sqrt{SE_{BE{F}_{h IPCC }}^2+SE_{V_1}^2}left[%right] (21 where ( S{E}_{BE{F}_{h IPCC }}^2S{E}_{V_1}^2 ) are percent standard errors associated with BEF h IPCC) and V 1, respectively.
The percent contribution of exposure uncertainty to total uncertainty is tabulated in Table 3. Exposure uncertainty contributed anywhere between 5%and31%1% to the total uncertainty in this analysis.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com