Suggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The p-value for each given score was the percent of random sequences that contained a target site with higher score.
The percent of random Fisher meta values from the background that are lower than the observed Fisher meta value of each region is reported as the p value of that region.
Similar(58)
To identify a group of people to serve as a comparison cohort, we identified a five percent simple random sample of all health plan enrollees that sought routine medical care with a physician and did not have an IBS diagnosis while enrolled with the health plan during the same period.
For the main analysis, we drew a five percent simple random sample (SRS) of articles that were returned by the query described above, published from 2001 to 2003, and curated in HuGE Pub Lit before May 30th, 2004 (n = 8,115) to yield a dataset of 406 articles.
Percent PPC from all districts for a given number of random and optimally timed alerts and for the annual alert were calculated in analogous ways.
We examine the trade-off between the number of images selected within transects and the number of random points scored within images on the percent cover of target biota, the typical output of such monitoring programs.
Because of its size and complexity we take a ten percent random sample of the relevant RED population – all grandfathered PP recipients as of 30th June 2006 – and track them for all IS episodes from the beginning of the episode which was ongoing on 30th June 2006 until 30th June 2009.
(I ) Percent of genes with dynamic SMRT binding during adipogenesis (red), of genes that lose/gain POLII upon SMRT KD (red), and of random genes (grey) that are significantly differentially expressed upon ZEB1 KD.
In the random group, the average percent of CN gain by size was 0.04% of the whole genome and 0.08% of the X chromosome; the average CN loss was 0.08% of the whole genome and 0.95% of the X chromosome.
Control subjects were randomly selected from a one percent random sample of residents aged 25 to 70 years drawn by the local population registration offices of the respective region.
A hodgepodge of random things.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com