Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Gap closure was quantified (Tscratch software) at both 0 and 24 hours and percent of closure determined with the following equation: percent of closure = average of ((gap area: 0 hour) – (gap area: 24 hours))/(gap area: 0 hour) using images from 12 different microscopic fields per well (4X magnification).
Similar(58)
Shown are the percentages of /ɡ/ responses (y-axis) over all listeners with respect to the factor voicing maintenance (in percent of the stop closure duration, x-axis).
This difference (in pixels) was then calculated and presented in terms of percent wound closure, or invasion measured.
Mean percent wound closure of groups was compared using t-test for normally distributed data and Mann–Whitney rank-sum test when data were not normally distributed.
Wound repair data are referenced to time point 0 h, with results presented as mean percent wound closure (out of 100%) after a given period of time ± standard deviation.
Mean values were expressed as a percent of wound closure, which was calculated as follows: Percent wound closure = 1 − (widtht/width0) × 100%.
Mean visual obstruction and percent canopy closure were the primary drivers of nest site selection on our study sites.
Percent canopy closure was also an important predictor of nest site selection.
Mean visual obstruction was the most important predictor of nest site selection followed by percent canopy closure.
Mean visual obstruction was the most important predictor of nest site selection followed by percent canopy closure (Table 2).
The opposite of closure.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com