Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
This we consider as necessary, since international C&T-trade perceives of a rather integrated structure.
The subjectivists accordingly claim that attributes are what the finite intellect perceives of substance as if constituting its essence.
These two principal avenues stem from some important ambiguities in the definition of "attribute": "By attribute I understand what the intellect perceives of substance as constituting its essence" (1D4).[12] The first term that is ambiguous is "intellect," since it can refer either to the finite intellect or the infinite one (cf. diagram in Section 1).
"By substance I understand what is in itself and is conceived through itself"; "By attribute I understand what the intellect perceives of a substance, as constituting its essence"; "By God I understand a being absolutely infinite, i.e., a substance consisting of an infinity of attributes, of which each one expresses an eternal and infinite essence".
The definition can therefore be read, either as stating that attributes are what the intellect perceives of substance as constituting its actual essence, or that attributes are what the intellect perceives only as if they are what constitute the essence but are not what in fact constitutes it or them.
That is, "By attribute I understand what the intellect perceives of substance as constituting its essence".[1] Nonetheless, it is astonishing how little agreement there is among scholars as to some of the most basic features of Spinoza's theory of attributes.
Similar(51)
Subjects rated the usability on the perceived-of-usefulness and perceived-ease-of-use scale [16] after each scenario.
'It was the best and worst you could perceive of.
What factors enter into what we perceive of as acceptably edible?
Double vision, also called diplopia, perceiving of two images of a single object.
Schmidt: In many ways we always wanted to be this Google, rather than the one we were perceived of last year.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com