Sentence examples for per unit reduction from inspiring English sources

Mean costs and effectiveness between the intervention and control groups will be compared and incremental cost effectiveness ratios presented (ICERs) in terms of the cost per unit reduction in HbA1c% and the cost per QALY gained.

Cost effectiveness will be assessed initially in terms of incremental cost per unit reduction in urinary sodium and BP, but modelled to estimate cost per life year saved and cost per Disability Adjusted Life Year averted.

Long-term follow up of children is desirable, but is depending on future funding The economic evaluation will be performed from a societal perspective, with the costs per unit reduction in the primary outcome ('bad neonatal outcomes') as the primary outcome measure.

The cost data will be combined with the behavioural and biomarker outcomes to produce a range of incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs), across both primary and secondary outcomes, including cost per unit reduction in sedentary time and cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained (based on AQoL-8D [ 72]).

As expected and shown in prior studies in China (Zhou et al. 2003, 2006), the highest population exposure reduction per unit emission reduction for PM2.5 is from controlling primary PM2.5 emissions rather than particle precursors.

To maximize the health benefits of emission reductions among different pollutants from different sectors, there are two major factors to consider the population exposure reduction per unit emission reduction and the amount of emissions that can be reduced from different sectors.

After the initial cost of research and development, cost reduction on a per unit basis should grow significantly over time, leading to Waymo's ability to get a lot closer to reaching prices car OEMs are more comfortable at scale, more quickly.

The number of urine samples collected from LAM positive patients, the proportion of samples testing positive and the median LAM-ELISA OD value at each time point during TB treatment are shown in Figure 2. OD measures decreased over the period of observation with a 0.004 unit reduction in OD per day (p < 0.001).

The high cost per unit of reduction increases further if the overlap with other technologies is considered (substitution of old heating systems by more efficient ones, for example).

A similar magnitude of association was seen in the PNFA group [75% odds increase per unit difficulty reduction (95% CI: 8 183%, P = 0.02)], but not in the semantic dementia group [9% odds increase per unit difficulty reduction (95% CI: –52 144%, P = 0.8)].

Although uncertainties related to C-R functions are significant, the estimated health benefits of emission reductions in the YRD are substantial, especially for sectors and pollutants with both higher health benefits per unit emission reductions and large potential for emission reductions.