Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
We conducted the test by varying the minimum number of instances per relation (hereafter, MIpR).
Similar(59)
Now we formulate the per-relation evaluation metrics.
On the other hand, the per-relation recall gradually improves up to 82% in group 5.
Our approach achieved the highest precision in both per-relation and per-instance evaluations.
To address this problem, we introduced a new "per-relation" basis evaluation method.
Finally, we turn to define the per-relation precision, recall, and F-score as follows.
In this work, we introduce a "per-relation" basis performance evaluation method.
The per-relation precision is around 95-96% and the per-instance precision is around 94-97%.
We show that our algorithm not only achieves better per-relation performance than previous solutions but also serves as a good complement to the existing PPI extraction tools.
However, because of the coarsely defined rules, they produce large numbers of false positives, making them inapplicable to use cases where "per-relation" precision is important.
As shown in Table 2, our rule-based approach exhibits the highest precision in all groups in both per-relation and per-instance evaluations.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com