Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(13)
Figure 19 Number of hypotheses used per prediction.
To process 300 through descriptor generation (fingerprint) and prediction requires 2625 milliseconds providing an average of 8.75 milliseconds per prediction.
It means that only about 24 (101,315/4254) bound templates are needed to do the time-consuming structural alignment with the query per prediction.
The figure presents a distribution of the hypothesis count per prediction during a 5 fold cross-validation experiment using the previous mutagenicity dataset (8201 structures).
It terms of how TappingStone plans to make money, it will follow a similar model to Twilio and charge developers per-usage, priced per data size and per prediction calls.
As per prediction of Cisco Visual Networking Index, 4G wireless networks will have 40.5% of the total mobile connections worldwide, out of which 75% of the mobile data traffic will be the video by 2020 [1].
Similar(47)
These studies mainly focused on the error distribution of a single wind farm based on a per-prediction horizon.
Besides predicting topology, reliability of the predictions is estimated as well, and it is demonstrated that the per protein prediction accuracies of more than 60%% of the predictions are over 98%% on the benchmark sets and most probably on the predicted human transmembrane proteome too.
As more disordered proteins have been identified, and as more sophisticated machine learning methods have been applied, the per residue prediction accuracy has risen from ~70%to~85%5%.
Monitoring per-protein prediction is more prone to over-optimization than monitoring per-residue performance as the set contains significantly fewer samples; it also may bias the results for predicting proteins with very short unstructured regions.
The Bayes empirical Bayes procedure allows estimating (i) the probability that a given site belongs to each ω category in the model and (ii) a per-site prediction of ω along with a confidence interval.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com