Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

per introduction

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "per introduction" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to something that is in accordance with or as stated in an introduction, often in formal or business contexts. Example: "As outlined per introduction, we will be implementing the new policy starting next month."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Payment only occurs if further action is taken, starting at $12.95 per introduction, though the first three are free.

News & Media

TechCrunch

Given a population of N individuals, a type of allele that emerges by mutation with a rate μ per gene per generation is introduced into the population at a rate 2Nμ (assuming diploids, i.e., 2 genes per individual), where it faces acceptance with probability π fixations per introduction.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

HomeAdvisor (acquired by IAC) had been the frontrunner in the pay-per-lead (or pay-per-introduction) model.

News & Media

TechCrunch

This could be attributed to the relatively sparse nature of the scale-free networks and a larger variation in node degree (refer to Figs. 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40) as we increase the initial number of nodes (for a fixed value of the initial number of links added per node introduction), especially for lower values of the number of new links added per node introduction.

On the other hand, for a given number of new links added per node introduction, the assortativity index for both the MNM and MAM decreases significantly as we increase the initial number of nodes from 3 to 10 and further to 20 (especially, for lower values of the number of new links added per node introduction).

The A.Index of the MAM is significantly larger than that of the MNM for scale-free networks that have a lower number of new links added per node introduction (as large as by a difference of 0.4); as we increase the number of links added per node introduction, the A.Index of MNM approaches to that of the MAM.

As a result, the initial set of nodes are bound to have a considerably larger degree than the newly introduced nodes (especially for smaller values of new links added per node introduction).

For a given initial number of nodes ((n_mathrm{init})) during the evolution of a scale-free network, we could observe that the difference in the assortative index values for the MAM and MDM gets larger with increase in the values for the number of new links (links (_mathrm{new})) added per node introduction (which leads to a decrease in the spectral radius ratio for node degree).

For a given number of new links added per node introduction, the % of node matches does not appreciably change for both the MAM and MNM as we increase the initial number of nodes from 3 to 10 and further to 20.

6: the values for the initial number of nodes ((n_mathrm{init})) are 3, 10 and 20; the values for the number of new links added per node introduction (links (_mathrm{new})) are: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15 and 20.

Though there is a tradeoff expected between A.Index and the % of node matches, the % of node matches incurred with the MAM is only about 3 9%% low compared to the % of node matches incurred with the MNM (the larger differences are observed when the number of new links added per node introduction is low).

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "per introduction", ensure the introduction clearly defines the details you're referencing. This avoids ambiguity and maintains clarity for your audience.

Common error

Avoid using "per introduction" if the introduction is not readily accessible or well-remembered by your audience. Instead, restate the relevant information for better clarity and comprehension.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "per introduction" functions as an adverbial phrase, modifying a verb or clause by specifying that something is happening or being done according to what was stated in the introduction. Ludwig indicates that it is mostly used as a prepositional phrase.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33.3%

News & Media

33.3%

Formal & Business

33.3%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "per introduction" serves as a concise way to reference information that has already been detailed in the introductory section of a document or presentation. According to Ludwig, this prepositional phrase, while grammatically correct, is relatively rare. Its usage is most common in scientific, news, and formal business contexts. When using "per introduction", ensure the introduction is clear and easily accessible to your audience to prevent confusion. If clarity cannot be guaranteed, consider restating the information for better comprehension.

FAQs

What does "per introduction" mean?

"Per introduction" means according to what was stated or explained in the introduction. It's often used to reference details, rates, or conditions initially outlined.

When is it appropriate to use "per introduction" in writing?

It's appropriate when you want to refer back to information already provided in the introductory section of a document or presentation, especially in business or formal contexts. Make sure the introduction is clear to the audience before using "per introduction".

What are some alternatives to "per introduction"?

Alternatives include phrases like "as initially stated", "according to the preamble", or "at the point of introduction". The best choice depends on the specific context and what you want to emphasize.

How can I ensure my use of "per introduction" is clear?

To ensure clarity, make sure your introduction explicitly covers the details you're referencing. If there's any ambiguity or if the introduction isn't easily accessible, restate the information instead of relying solely on "per introduction".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: