Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Eight Holstein cows (multiparous, 608.8 ± 31.5 kg) at mid-lactation were randomly assigned to 5-d jugular infusions of control (saline), Arg (3 g/h), LPS (0.033 μg/kg per h), and LPS + Arg (0.033 μg/kg per h of LPS and 3 g/h of Arg) in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design with 4 infusion periods separated by 10-d noninfusion periods.
To compensate for losses due to evaporation, a volume of 4 ml/kg per h of FC 3280 was continuously administered endotracheally when PLV was performed [ 11].
Similar(58)
First, this glial subgroup comprises a defined population of 12 cells (per hs) of known origin and identity (von Hilchen et al., 2008).
The proposed AVIS allowed for an injection rate of 2800 per h on average.
Glucose incorporation into lipids was calculated and expressed as nmoles of glucose incorporated per 100 mg tissue per 1 h of incubation.
Aromatase activity was expressed as the rate of incorporation of tritium into water per milligram of protein per 4 h of incubation.
A meta-analysis of this set of studies found that prolonged screen time was modestly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] per 2 h of television viewing per day = 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07, 1.18) and fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular disease (aHR per 2 h of television viewing per day = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.06, 1.23).
No clear trends were found for either of these locations with respect to change in volume per year of latency and per 100 h of cumulative use (data not in table).
The risk of death in hospital increased with surgical delay (odds ratio (OR) = 1.3 per 24 h of delay), ASA score (OR (per point added) = 2.3), sex (OR for men 2.2), and age (OR (per 5 years) = 1.4).
Fig. 2 can be used to calculate the cost per MW h of electricity produced: for a coal reference plant 45 € per MW h without CCS vs. 70 € per MW h using CCS.
The estimated total incidence was 1.25 ± 3.0 muscles injuries per 1000 h of exposure.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com