Exact(8)
For example, in the most extreme case of the RCV3-W5 link, the horizontal dipole results in a PER of approximately 90%%, whereas the PER for the vertical one is only about 8%%.
Devoted wife of Per for 58 years.
Kirsten, who worked as a librarian, resented Per for this.
The best PER for EPL1 is 17.99 % with 91.37 % sparsity.
Let be the PER for the th recipient.
Using (38) with, we find PER for every recipient.
Fig. 20 PER for various RSSI levels before and after CRC error correction.
As the figure shows, the PER for the direct transmission is very high (higher than 40%).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com