Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
per contributor
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "per contributor" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate a distribution or allocation of something on an individual basis for each contributor involved. Example: "The funds will be distributed equally, with $100 allocated per contributor."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Alternative expressions(19)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
16 human-written examples
The Democrats' plan would match contributions 2 to 1, up to $500 per contributor, in return for spending limits.
News & Media
Mr. Bush needs to raise at least some money under the regular federal limitations of $1,000 per contributor.
News & Media
Contributions to federal campaigns are limited to $1,000 per contributor in general elections, not a lot given the cost of television ads.
News & Media
But in exchange, they are subject to fund-raising limits of $2,700 per contributor per election, while outside groups can raise and spend unlimited funds.
News & Media
Local and state party committees may not accept donations above $5,000 a year per contributor, while the limit for national party committees is $20,000.
News & Media
Still, the proposal would place only a $76,500 limit per contributor on "soft money" instead of banning these party slush funds altogether.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
44 human-written examples
Ireland, traditionally one of the strongest per-capita contributors to UN budgets, has been forced to slash its spending on overseas aid by nearly half over the past year.
News & Media
Being a multicultural nation of migrants and migrant descendants, and a major per capita contributor to the climate migration issue, Australia already seems ideally positioned to become a world leader in the area of climate migration both morally and practically.
News & Media
The country has earned a reputation it could do without: It has become Europe's biggest per capita contributor of fighters to Syria, and its capital has become an incubator for radicalism.
News & Media
We see on average nearly 1,000 artifacts enhanced per individual contributor (Table 4, AD).
The social network analysis metrics reveal that this translates to an average of about 65 provided/enhanced content items per individual contributor (Table 1, AD).
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using the phrase "per contributor", ensure that the context clearly defines what constitutes a 'contribution'. This avoids ambiguity and ensures accurate interpretation.
Common error
Avoid assuming that "per contributor" always implies monetary donations. The term 'contributor' can refer to anyone providing input, resources, or effort, depending on the context. Consider the wider meaning to avoid misinterpretations.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "per contributor" functions as an adverbial phrase, modifying a verb or noun by specifying a rate, amount, or limit that applies to each individual contributor. As Ludwig AI shows, it's commonly used in contexts related to finance, donations, and resource allocation.
Frequent in
News & Media
40%
Science
30%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
5%
Wiki
5%
Academia
10%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "per contributor" is a grammatically sound and commonly used phrase that serves to specify amounts, limits, or allocations on an individual basis. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is versatile, appearing across news, scientific, and formal business contexts, indicating its broad applicability. While alternatives like "for each donor" or "per participant" may suit specific scenarios, "per contributor" remains a clear and direct way to express individual attribution in various forms of contribution. When employing this phrase, clarity is key: ensure that the definition of 'contribution' is well-established to prevent any misunderstandings. Furthermore, consider the scope of 'contributor' to encompass not only monetary donations but also diverse forms of input and support.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
For each donor
Replaces "contributor" with "donor", emphasizing the act of giving.
For every individual contributor
Emphasizes the individual nature of each contribution.
Per person contributing
Adds a more descriptive element, clarifying the action of contributing.
Per donation
Focuses on the donation itself, rather than the individual giving it.
Per participant
Uses a more general term, suitable for contexts beyond monetary contributions.
Per supporter
Replaces "contributor" with "supporter", highlighting the backing aspect.
Per member
Suitable when referring to contributions within a membership context.
Attributed to each giver
Focuses on the act of giving, using a more descriptive verb.
For each contributing party
Adds a formal tone and emphasizes the role of the contributor.
Allocated to each contributor
Focuses on the distribution aspect, highlighting what each contributor receives.
FAQs
How do I use "per contributor" in a sentence?
You can use "per contributor" to specify an amount, limit, or allocation that applies to each individual contributing to a project, campaign, or fund. For example: "The donation limit is $1,000 "for each donor"".
What are some alternatives to "per contributor"?
Alternatives include "for each donor", "per donation", "for every individual contributor", or "per participant", depending on the context.
Is it correct to say "per contributor" or should I use another phrase?
"Per contributor" is a correct and widely accepted phrase. Its suitability depends on the context and desired level of formality. If you need to be more formal, you might opt for "for each contributing party".
What's the difference between "per contributor" and "per capita"?
"Per contributor" refers to individual contributors to a specific cause or project, while "per capita" refers to 'per person' in a general population. For example, you might measure donations "per contributor" to a campaign, but income "per capita" in a country.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested