Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(55)
Mr. McCutcheon and the R.N.C. say they object to the aggregate limit on contributions, not to the per candidate limit.
And the official cap on spending per candidate has meant less business.
In all likelihood, the number of jobs per candidate is much smaller than the report suggests.
The federal limit for individual contributions per candidate per election is $2,500.
They also come to power with some of the lowest votes per candidate in city history.
The combined cost of these checks, $50 per candidate, would be levied in addition to the original $25 filing fee.
This year, the limit on such "hard" donations is five thousand dollars per candidate, and thirty thousand eight hundred dollars to a national political party.
Similar(4)
Without losing much reliability, we could have saved $50 per candidate by employing twelve single rater stations.
As the court recognized in the Buckley case, they are a "quite modest restraint" that help prevent evasion of the per-candidate limit.
Mr. McCutcheon contends that striking down the overall limit would not undermine protections against corruption because an individual would still be bound by the per-candidate limits.
Now, candidates in hot Congressional races are spending $1 million, with soft-dollar spending from parties and interest groups adding $1 million to $2 million more to the per-candidate tab, consultants say.
More suggestions(5)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com