peers

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "peers" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to individuals who are of equal standing or status, often in a social or professional context. Example: "In a collaborative environment, it's important to respect the opinions of your peers."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The MPs and peers suggested that the new legislation should list every intrusive capability available to the security services and specify their purpose, authorisation procedure and what safeguards and oversight procedures exist for their use.

The Guardian

MPs and peers laughed as Merkel, who recalled her first visit to London in the spring of 1990 shortly after the fall of the Berlin Wall, said those expecting a "fundamental reform of the European architecture" in Britain's direction would be disappointed.

The Guardian

The shares have underperformed the market by 6% in the last three months and now trade at a discount to the oil service peers.

The Guardian - Business

But poor children in Stoke-on-Trent start school two years behind their peers in leafier parts of the country.

The Guardian

In the Lords, he became a fixture of the bar, always the centre of a disparate group of fellow peers, from right and left.

The Guardian

There is interesting follow-up work to be done here on teachers', parents' and peers' responses to poorer children achieving grades above expectations, and indeed how this plays out across gender, ethnicity and for pupils with additional needs.

The Guardian

A typical combined salary for a WSL player also on one of 27 "central" England contracts is around £45,000 per annum – peanuts compared to their male peers but an infinite improvement on the £5 match fees commonly paid by leading clubs only a couple of decades ago.

The Guardian - Sport

It was just a taste of what 95 MPs, peers and parliament staff have already experienced on mindfulness meditation courses inside parliament.

The Guardian

Noticing the cramps and moans of my peers, my absent period appeared to be a blessing of genetics.

The Guardian

"Seeing how their feelings get hurt by their peers," he said, "on purpose or not, it derails them for the rest of the day.

The Guardian

Related: Groundless anti-terror laws must go | Letters Many peers expressed concern, but when highlighting aspects of this invasive control of our universities, schools, and national institutions they seemed quite unaware that its provisions (through the Prevent policy, set up in 2011) are already having lethal effects across the country, closing down public space where freedom lives.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In formal contexts, consider using "peers" to foster a sense of equality and mutual respect among individuals of similar standing.

Common error

Avoid using "peers" when the individuals being discussed are clearly in a hierarchical relationship. Instead, consider using terms like "colleagues", "superiors", or "subordinates" to accurately reflect the power dynamics at play.

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "peers" is as a plural noun. It refers to a group of individuals who are considered to be on equal footing, sharing similar status, age, or abilities. Ludwig provides numerous examples of this usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

76%

Formal & Business

14%

Science

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the term "peers" is a frequently used plural noun that signifies individuals sharing similar status, age, or abilities. As highlighted by Ludwig, its usage spans various contexts, including news, business, and academia, indicating its versatility. According to Ludwig AI, the term is grammatically correct, making it a reliable choice for both formal and informal communication. When using "peers", consider the specific group you are referencing and the potential for misinterpretation, opting for alternatives like "colleagues" or "equals" for clarity when necessary.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Equals

Refers to individuals who are on the same level or share similar status and abilities.

Colleagues

Focuses on individuals working in the same professional environment.

Contemporaries

Highlights individuals living or existing at the same time.

Fellows

Emphasizes a sense of shared membership or association in a particular group.

Associates

Indicates a connection or relationship, often in a professional or business context.

Counterparts

Stresses similarity in function or role, often in different organizations or locations.

Classmates

Specifically refers to individuals who attend the same school or classes.

Comrades

Implies a sense of shared struggle or purpose, often in a political or military context.

Siblings

Refers to individuals sharing the same parents.

Friends

Focuses on a personal relationship built on mutual affection and trust.

FAQs

How can I use "peers" in a sentence?

You can use "peers" to refer to people who are similar in age, status, or ability. For example, "Students often learn from their "fellow students"" or "Professionals value feedback from their "colleagues"".

What's a good alternative to using "peers"?

Depending on the context, you could use "equals", "colleagues", "contemporaries", or "fellow members".

Is it correct to use "peers" to describe people of different ages?

While "peers" most commonly refers to individuals of similar age or standing, its appropriateness depends on the specific context. If individuals are in similar roles or situations despite age differences, "peers" may still be applicable. For example, in a mentorship program.

What is the difference between "peers" and "associates"?

"Peers" implies a sense of equality and shared standing, while "associates" simply indicates a connection or relationship, without necessarily implying equal status. "Peers" often share similar experiences, knowledge, or skills, whereas "associates" may have diverse backgrounds and roles.