Sentence examples for peer review selection from inspiring English sources

Medical staff organisation– including peer review, selection and continued review of new staff members, and participation in policy making committees have also been shown to be positively related to quality of patient care [ 8].

We are already familiar with two types of funding mechanisms: non-targeted research funding channeled into the academic sector through a system of peer-review selection, and establishment of independent laboratories designed to meet specific demands in the manner frequently practiced by government laboratories and private firms.

A system of peer review and selection by boards or committees is common to many funding organisations internationally [ 20– 20].

This was built into the program's calls for proposals as well as the peer review and selection processes.

One study 10 estimated that 38 416 reviews per grant would be required to get a high precision for the peer review and selection of grants from the National Institutes of Health.

The initial planning phase involved developing the initial program theory of change and translating that into competitive calls for proposals, peer review and selection processes, and setting up contractual granting arrangements with grantees.

The journal follows the same procedures as most other scientific journals, with a call for papers as well as peer review and editorial selection processes.

Specific restoration projects must be coordinated and integrated within the framework of a comprehensive ecosystem restoration strategy; be linked to specific, measurable, and feasible outcomes; and subject to independent scientific review peer review in the selection and evaluation processes.

Using this model we are able to determine not only the validity of the editorial decisions (percentage of erroneous and correct decisions) but also (and especially) the usefulness of the peer review for the selection decisions.

The authors propose that one method of providing this support and coaching could be by a process of peer review of a selection of papers prior to the main marking.

It is possible that locally driven and funded trials conducted in North America do not have to meet the same challenges of international peer review and intense competitive selection.