Sentence examples for peer review experts from inspiring English sources

This growth in the number of peer review experts and the range in their expertise reflects the journal's continuing expansion of breadth, depth, and range of subject matter.

But Jose Tarazona, the head of Efsa's pesticides unit, insisted that its 6,000-page 6,000-page hassessmenthadstive, comprehensive and opposed beennly onexhaustivemember of the peer review expert group of scomprehensive nandopposedperts.

But having spent the past year looking in detail at alternatives - particularly whether we could ditch the peer review, expert-led model of assessment that underpins the REF, in favour of a metric-based approach - let me out myself as a growing enthusiast.

Moreover flexibility shows in a pluralist approach of using a diversity of methodological concepts whenever considered appropriate: e.g. a diversity of participatory approaches (e.g. the analytical deliberative approach, extended peer review, expert elicitation and participatory evaluation) and analytical approaches (e.g. multi-criteria analysis and qualitative analysis).

Groups representing vice-chancellors are adamant that peer review by experts in the field must continue to play a part, although they agree that the current RAE - which involves 82 expert panels - needs reform.

Today Mr Rammell confirmed the group's recommendation that the RAE go ahead in 2008 but with a shadow metrics exercise to check whether statistics really do come up with the same results as peer review by experts in each field.

Most recently, we have seen a proliferation of gold OA megajournals following a variety of "publish then filter" models (e.g., PLoS One, F1000Research, and SAGE Open) that advertise fast publishing, article-level metrics, and open commenting as an alternative to stringent prepublication peer review by experts in a disciplinary community.

Papers that finally appear in GBE have been subjected to rigorous peer review by experts in the field of genome evolution.

Firstly, the Excellence Designation System proposed relies on peer review by experts, which requires organisation and participant input, while the set of indicators that we have developed can be measured using bibliometric data with minimal effort from participants.

It means that the depth of knowledge present on this and similarly constituted government regulatory agency panels is unlikely to be sufficient to subject draft assessments to the scrutiny that peer review by experts normally entails.

Aggregation will occur in a bottom-up fashion in which the best representation (according to peer review and expert oversite) of each component will be combined.