Similar(60)
Accordingly, this paper evaluated the relationships between (1) the h-index and its main variants and (2) rankings of researchers' influence as assessed by research peers in the same field.
In more practical terms, as van Gunsteren puts it, finding peers in the same field of expertise both with no connection and in no competition with a given author could be an arduous task.
This is the heart of quality control: peers – experts working in the same field – anonymously review the work; they challenge it, critique it, ask for new perspectives to be considered, and may even suggest changes in the analysis and presentation.
For the configuration of peer review dyads, Mendonca and Johnson (1994) found that peer review dyads from different fields of study generated more negotiations that peer review dyads of the same field of study.
Professional meetings are the locus for both recognition of subject matter achievement and dialogue with peers who are experts in the same field.
All workshop participants agreed that disclosure policies boil down to a mechanism in which disclosure enables peer reviewers and other professionals in the same field to alert journal staff if authors fail to disclose appropriately.
He had visited Poitiers twice to see the skull, and the paper had been anonymously peer-reviewed by five independent scientists in the same field.
For these peers do not have direct stakes in the same field of contribution concerned, their reviews would possibly be more detached and neutral, thus reliable.
When a manuscript is submitted, reviewers who are researching and publishing work in the same field (peers) are asked to evaluate the content of the manuscript (e.g., significance and originality of the research findings) and recommend to the editor that the manuscript be published, revised and then published, or rejected [1].
8 10 The second concern relates to the possible negative effects of open peer review on relationships among individuals working in the same field.
A recent literature review suggested that peer review [ 26] is a common element of performance assessment and is sometimes "... the only mechanism to judge the professional practice of others working in the same field...because the peer regularly performs similar work and possesses the relevant expertise to evaluate it".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com