"peer experts" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It typically refers to people who have expertise in a particular subject and can help advise, mentor, or offer feedback to peers. For example, "The team consulted several peer experts in the field to make sure their project was successful."
The results would be considered separately by administrators and the peer experts, whose judgments would be sent to a neutral arbitrator.
A GA3 crystal weighing 100 g obtained with Li's strains was displayed at the Leipzig Trade Fair, shocked peer experts from other countries, and won great glory for our country.
In the peer-review process, once a team of researchers has completed a paper, they submit it to a journal that then circulates it to two to three peer experts for critique.
The presence of peer experts may have in some ways allowed students to avoid taking on unfamiliar roles.
Likewise, it has been claimed that sanctions are less likely if the case is assessed by a peer expert witness [ 2].
They are decided by a committee comprised of civil servants, professors, peers, experts and former MPs and then ratified by the Prime Minister and Queen.
This is the heart of quality control: peers – experts working in the same field – anonymously review the work; they challenge it, critique it, ask for new perspectives to be considered, and may even suggest changes in the analysis and presentation.
By giving enterprises a road map for measuring their emissions and pointing out how they compare with their peers, experts say, the voluntary project is persuading companies to change their energy practices well before many governments step in to regulate emissions.
Previous studies claim that students should have an opportunity to engage themselves with practising researchers and a community of peers, experts, and others.
Both expert and resident groups were supposed to be peers: experts among experts and residents among residents.
Before any research findings can be formally accepted, they must be evaluated and commented upon by peers (experts in their fields), who then provide advice about the quality or validity of the work to Editors, or in the case of open peer review and post-publication invited peer review systems, to the readers themselves.
