"peer discussion" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It typically refers to discussion taking place between peers (people of the same status or age) in a professional or educational setting. For example, "Our teacher led a peer discussion about the best ways to approach the problem."
We conclude that student race/ethnicity, nationality, gender, and relative biology competency can predict students' experiences with peer discussion.
We find that students in general vote more correctly following peer discussion, supporting previous work (Smith et al., 2009, 2011) and indicating that their engagement in peer discussion improved their understanding.
We also found that the initial response rates within peer discussion groups influenced whether students changed to the correct answer.
We designed a study in which students in an introductory biology course engaged in clickers with peer discussion during class.
At the program, Lorell takes part in peer discussion groups, in which members share stories and talk about subjects of mutual interest.
Didactic approaches to Relationships and Sex Education (RSE) have been shown to yield limited outcomes when compared to approaches that stimulate peer discussion and debate.
In their teaching, clickers are used daily to promote problem solving and peer discussion.
Moreover, collaborative GBL allows students to re-construct and co-construct knowledge, thus encouraging problem-solving through peer discussion.
For a comprehensive overview of this debate see Nijhawan's [2] recent article in Behavioural and Brain Sciences and the associated peer discussion.
They found that peer discussion followed by instructor explanation lead to greater learning gains than either peer discussion or instructor explanation alone.
For example, the impact of high-stakes grading on peer discussion and the consequences of displaying the voting results before peer discussion is unclear.
