"peer comparison" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used to refer to the act of comparing oneself to others in a similar group or age range. Example: "The pressure to fit in and conform to societal expectations often stems from constant peer comparison among teenagers."
It is intended to help arts groups professionally present themselves to supporters, to help their staffs and boards make informed decisions and to allow for peer comparison.
As a source of peer comparison, it has not exactly lived up to its promise -- most participating colleges and universities have been reluctant to share results.
Peer comparison is thus one of the most elementary forms of conceptualizing reciprocal social relationships.
"Competition, peer comparison and social comparison to normative predetermined targets result in only short-term motivational effects".
A stronger correlation was observed between self-efficacy judged on enactive mastery experience (past performance) compared to self-efficacy judged on vicarious experience (peer comparison).
Furthermore, no subsequent peer comparison indicated a significant difference from the overall value (Tukey post-hoc test, group I vs II, p = 0.906, group I vs III, p = 0.638, and group II vs III, p = 0.448).
Irrational humans also tend to follow the crowd, which means that peer comparisons form an important part of the 'choice architecture'.
Under the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program, hospitals will receive risk-adjusted outcomes feedback for peer comparisons and benchmarking.
As new understandings emerged about the role of peer comparisons, the team gave access to class results on practice quizzes.
The result of peer comparisons is that chief executive pay grew from 40 times average worker pay in 1980 to 433 times in 2007.
Overall, the students seem focused on the usefulness of the feedback provided by the TEFA strategies for both personal use and peer comparisons.
