Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(10)
Differences in bunk utilization between peak type and pen row type were observed; tertiary bunk utilization with 2-row pens was significantly lower than bunk utilization with 3-row pens and significantly lower than either primary or secondary bunk utilization in 2-row pens.
For the peak type curves, the changepoint isintuitively defined by the highest peak, whereas for the increasing and decreasingtypes the point is identified by the time in which the linguistic representation ofthe series transitions from H or M to L status(decreasing) or from L or M to H status (increasing).
For the peak type curves, the changepoint is intuitively defined by the highest peak, whereas for the increasing and decreasing types the point is identified by the time in which the linguistic representation of the series transitions from H to M or L status (decreasing) or from L or M to H status (increasing).
The cluster was then assigned to the peak type closest to the obtained mean value.
The 'PT' column shows the peak type of each motif (LP: large peak, SP: small peak, and NP: no peak).
A total of ten gradient fractions were collected for vacuum centrifugal concentration based on the peak type and time.
Similar(50)
Next, we considered the relationship between the different peak types and the classes of motif pairs.
Each single motif was assigned into one of four peak types: 'Large Peak (LP)'Smallall Peak (SP)', 'No Peak (NP)', and 'No Data (ND)'.
For peak types LP, SP, NP, and ND, we assigned numbers 4, 3, 2, and 1, respectively.
Figure 6 presents two typical curves for motion repulsion with different peak types across subjects, one with a simple repulsion effect (subject B) and one of the strongest opposite directions effects (subject H).
Several features of these two classes of motif pairs were then examined, with the results being summarized in Table 3. LP, SP, NP are the different peak types for single motifs (LP: large peak, SP: small peak, and NP: no peak).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com