Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(23)
The pseudo-static contribution to the peak response was seen to be very significant (>90%) particularly for low wave velocities even though the span was only 6.0 m for the non-interactive structure.
The VS evoked an increase from baseline to percent peak response in both the posterior (15.2 ± 7.7%, P < 0.01) and anterior (7.6 ± 3.5%, P < 0.01) cerebral hemispheres; however, the percent peak response was higher in the posterior brain, where visual regions are localized (P = 0.01).
The left-sided task, VF, resulted in an increase in both the left (12.2 ± 4.0%, P < 0.01) and right (9.0 ± 4.4%, P < 0.01) cerebral hemispheres; however, the percent peak response was higher in the left brain, where language centers are located (P < 0.01).
The right-sided task, VST, evoked an increase in both the left (13.9 ± 7.1%, P < 0.01) and right (16.8 ± 6.7%, P < 0.01) cerebral hemispheres; however, the percent peak response was higher in the right brain, where visuospatial regions are located (P < 0.01).
The temporal dimension of observed variation in total transcriptional regulation further supported this reasoning; a peak response was observed at 9 00 in the thyroid and 3 h later in the kidney cortex, kidney medulla, and spleen.
Although an IFN-γ response was detectable as early as four weeks after the prime, the peak response was detected one week after the first boost with AERAS-402.
Similar(37)
For the animals with odor-responsive AWB neurons, the average size of the AWB response and the peak response are unchanged by aging.
The Liapunov method is used and several general bounds on the peak response are developed.
It is shown that the breathing behaviour and the peak response are strongly influenced by the unbalance orientation angle relative to the crack direction.
A mathematical description of the differential peak response is given and an electropherogram of an application in red wine is shown.
BOLD responses to individual digit stimulations were mapped and their response properties (location, area of activation, % signal change, time to peak response) were compared within and across imaging sessions separated by up to 20 months.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com