Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
The distribution range of throat is narrow, changing from 0.2 0.5 to 0.2 1.0 μm, and the throat peak radius slightly increases along with an increasing permeability (as illustrated in Fig. 3).
It can be learned from Table 2 that the throat peak radius is less than 1 μm and the maximum is 0.5 μm when the permeability is less than 1 × 10−3 μm2.
Nevertheless, as can be seen from Table 2 and Fig. 5, if permeability is greater than 1 × 10−3 μm2, the peak radius of throat will increase, distributing in 0.5 1.0 μm.
When the permeability is less than 1 × 10−3 μm2, the throat peak radius and the average throat radius will be less than 1 μm; furthermore, the variation of throat distribution is in the range of 0.2 0.5 and 0.2 1.0 μm.
Similar(56)
We found that the order in the magnitude of the peak radii in the size distributions agrees with that in the magnitude of the gyratory radius measured from the small-angle X-ray scattering curves of the RF solutions during their gelation process.
As for the eleven samples, the content of throat peak value radius decreases from maximum 72.3 to 6.62 % with the increasing permeability.
Firstly, the autocorrelation peak sharpness radius of a pre-processed image of the considered pattern is proposed to quantitatively evaluate how a particular strain sensor pattern influences the sensitivity of a DIC measurement.
As a result, a single peak with hydrodynamic radius of 8.9 nm and low polydispersity index, i.e. 13.4% was obtained.
For the dimer fraction we observe one peak with mean radius of 2.28 nm, which for a globular protein corresponds to a Mw of 22 kDa (21.49 expected for S100B dimer).
For the tetramer fraction we observe one peak with mean radius of 3.10 nm, which for a globular protein would correspond to a Mw of 47.5 kDa (43.0 expected for S100B tetramer).
First, corner vertices are obtained as minimum radius peaks in the discrete radius function, where radius is obtained from differences.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com