Sentence examples for peak preference from inspiring English sources

Remarkably, both latitude- and longitude-wise distribution patterns of the drought tolerant accessions also clearly showed a single peak preference where the preferred latitude 20-24°N 20-24°Nongitude (80-100°E) were identicandto other abiotic stress tolongitude(Fig. 80-100°E

Our results indicate that female preference functions probably vary in terms of peak preference (i.e., the phenotype of the most-preferred male) and choosiness (i.e., the width of the preference function), so at least two parameters should be necessary to describe mating preferences in female D. melanogaster.

Both latitude- and longitude-wise distributions of the cold tolerant accessions (SES score 1-3) showed a single peak preference (Fig. 9b, c), despite the occurrence of tolerant accessions in the wider spectrum.

However, if we fill the gap using the zinc deficiency field screening data pattern, then clearly it shows the same single peak preference and, as expected, it lies in Bangladesh.

Finally, if the preference function has an intermediate peak, then each individual female may have a "peak preference," an ornament value to which she responds most readily.

Our data show that female D. melanogaster likely show unimodal preference functions and that genotypes differ from one another with respect to both peak preference and choosiness.

Interestingly, both latitude- and longitude-wise distribution of tolerant and highly tolerant accessions clearly showed single peak preferences (Fig. 1b-c, e-f), and both were completely within the same latitude 20-24°N 20-24°Nongitude band (90-100°E).

Future theoretical and empirical work should consider the possibility that both peak preferences and choosiness may simultaneously evolve in nature.

Thus, our results leave open the possibility that peak preferences also are genetically correlated with male attractiveness or specific male trait values.

We can conclude from these observations that female D. melanogaster show unimodal preference functions with genetic variation in peak preferences (or possibly a preference function even more complex than those considered here).

In particular, males are characterized by preference functions in which different male genotypes largely rank females similarly by attractiveness, a situation that arises under open-ended preference functions or unimodal preference functions with no genetic variation in peak preferences.