peace talks

USAGE SUMMARY

"peace talks" is a correct and commonly used phrase in written English.
It is typically used to refer to formal discussions or negotiations between opposing parties in an attempt to resolve a conflict or establish peace. Example: The two countries have been engaged in ongoing peace talks in hopes of ending the war that has devastated their region for years.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"Peace talks!

The New York Times

How about peace talks?

The New York Times

Peace talks may resume soon.

The New Yorker

Third, push for peace talks.

The New York Times

Peace talks are stalemated.

The New York Times

Peace talks stopped.

The New York Times

Peace talks with Israel are frozen.

The New York Times

Previous attempts at peace talks have failed.

Independent

He would continue the peace talks.

The Economist

Not that there are any peace talks.

The New York Times

Peace talks were suspended five months ago.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "peace talks" when referring to formal discussions aimed at resolving conflicts between nations, groups, or factions. Ensure the context clearly indicates who the involved parties are and what the subject of the negotiations is.

Common error

Avoid using "peace talks" to describe casual conversations or minor disagreements. This term is reserved for formal negotiations in situations of significant conflict.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "peace talks" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It denotes a specific type of discussion focused on conflict resolution, as evidenced by Ludwig's examples from various news and media outlets.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

94%

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Less common in

Science

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Social Media

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "peace talks" is a very common and grammatically correct noun phrase used to describe formal discussions aimed at resolving conflicts. Ludwig AI confirms its frequent usage in news and media, encyclopedias and wiki contexts. While its register is generally neutral, it can become more professional in business or political settings. When writing about conflict resolution, remember that this term is reserved for discussions of high significance. For alternative phrasing, consider options like "negotiations for peace" or "conflict resolution discussions", adjusting for the specific context. Always avoid using it for casual disagreements.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

negotiations for peace

Replaces the more common term "talks" with the broader term "negotiations".

conflict resolution discussions

Emphasizes the process of resolving conflict through discussion.

peace process dialogue

Focuses on the ongoing nature of establishing peace.

conciliation meetings

Highlights the act of bringing parties together for reconciliation.

settlement negotiations

Implies the goal is to reach a formal settlement.

ceasefire discussions

Specifically relates to discussions about establishing a ceasefire.

diplomatic parleys

Uses a more formal and traditional term for discussions.

amicable dialogue

Emphasizes the friendly nature of the conversation.

talks to end hostilities

Focuses on the specific aim of ending conflict.

resolution-focused discussions

Highlights the intent to reach a resolution.

FAQs

What does "peace talks" mean?

"Peace talks" refers to formal discussions or negotiations between opposing parties aimed at resolving a conflict and establishing peace. These talks often involve diplomatic efforts and can be crucial for ending wars or disputes.

What can I say instead of "peace talks"?

You can use alternatives like "negotiations for peace", "conflict resolution discussions", or "settlement negotiations" depending on the context.

Are "peace talks" always successful?

No, "peace talks" are not always successful. They can stall, collapse, or fail to achieve their intended goals due to various factors such as disagreements, shifting political landscapes, or renewed hostilities.

What is the difference between "peace talks" and "ceasefire negotiations"?

"Peace talks" generally encompass a broader range of discussions aimed at resolving the underlying causes of a conflict and establishing long-term peace, while "ceasefire negotiations" specifically focus on ending immediate hostilities and establishing a truce.