By the Agricultural Adjustment Act, the amount of the tax is appropriated to be expended only in payment under contracts whereby the parties bind themselves to regulation by the Federal Government.
A contract entered into under paragraph (1) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose, and that total liability to the Government for termination of any contract entered into shall be limited to the total amount of funding obligated at time of termination.
Platini has conceded he received an annual payment under a contract with Fifa to be Blatter's adviser between 1999 and 2002.
A lawsuit of that duration, while undoubtedly something of a hardship, cannot be said to deprive respondent of its claim for payment under the contract.
"We're in a dispute with her over her payment under the contract for our services," said Douglas McIntyre, chief executive of On2.com.
Payment under each contract (or agreement) between the Secretary and a State home under paragraph (1) shall be based on a methodology, developed by the Secretary in consultation with the State home, to adequately reimburse the State home for the care provided by the State home under the contract (or agreement).
Sirius, which lags XM Satellite Radio in total subscribers, has apparently awarded more than $220 million in shock-jock stock to His Highness, saying Stern has already attracted enough subscribers to be entitled to the payment under his contract.
Payment under their contracts is based on other criteria, such as the free flow of traffic or the percentage of uncontested fines.
Held: Because state law affords G & G sufficient opportunity to pursue its claim for payment under its contracts in state court, the statutory scheme does not deprive it of due process.
We assume, without deciding, that the withholding of money due respondent under its contracts occurred under color of state law, and that, as the Court of Appeals concluded, respondent has a property interest of the kind we considered in Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co., 455 U.S. 422 (1982), in its claim for payment under its contracts.
The power to increase charges for service had been twice exercised by the Railroad Commission at the behest of the canal company, and the times and terms of payment under the contracts had been changed by the same power, and so far as the petitioner was concerned, its privileges and emoluments under the contract had been greatly increased.
