Sentence examples for pay a threshold of from inspiring English sources

The probability of intraprocedural CEUS being cost-effective was over 50%%, with a willingness to pay a threshold of €5755.

At a willingness to pay a threshold of $40 000, the treatment with hawthorn extract has a 0.29 probability of being cost-effective.

We can see that PLD/carboplatin is cost-effective in nearly 49.4% of samples at a willingness to pay a threshold of $20,000, which is close to the GDP per capita of Korea.

For thermal clothing to be cost-effective at the willingness to pay a threshold of $A 64 000 per quality adjusted life year (QALY) 35 would require a QALY gain of just 0.003 years (or 1 day) per person given thermal clothing.

The probabilistic sensitivity analysis for the lifetime horizon for a dosage of rosuvastatin 20 mg versus simvastatin or atorvastatin 40 mg indicated that, at a maximum willingness to pay a threshold of SEK500,000, rosuvastatin treatment would be acceptable in approximately 75%85%% of simulations.

In these circumstances, a tax cut for high-rollers (the 50p rate kicks in when pay crosses a threshold of £150,000) would be provocative - and surprising from this most politically vigilant of chancellors.

A cost-effectiveness acceptability curve was created to determine whether implementation of DCP was cost-effective given different thresholds of willingness to pay for QALYs (e.g., a threshold of €20,000 per QALY).

Assuming a willingness to pay adoption threshold of £25 000 per QALY, the expected value or NMB of changing a patient from low adherence to high adherence was £33 897 (95% CI: £28 322–£28 652).

At a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of €50,000, the probability that IFNβ-1b was cost-effective was around 80%, which would increase to 90% at a WTP threshold of €80,000.

From the health care perspective the implementation revealed overall costs of €5.320 per recovered patient, with an acceptability curve showing a 100% probability for a positive COR at a willingness to pay threshold of €6.500 per recovered patient.

At a willingness to pay threshold of £20,000 for an additional QALY then the probability that CPU care will be considered cost-effective rises to about 70%.