Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Restriction patterns were interpreted by using the genome type classification scheme of Li and Wadell (10 ) and Li et al. (11 ).
Similar(59)
MICs were interpreted by using EUCAST criteria (www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/).org/clinical_breakpoints/
*MICs were interpreted by using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (www.clsi.org).org
The results were interpreted by using software version AMS R09.1.
Data were interpreted by using the broth microdilution criteria (7 ).
Banding patterns were interpreted by two independent persons using GelCompar software (Applied Maths NV, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium).
Banding patterns were interpreted by visual inspection and with GelCompar II (version 4.01), using the Dice index and the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA).
Diffraction patterns were interpreted by comparison with JCPDS data.
Diffraction patterns were interpreted by the PDF (ICDD) in-build library of standard compounds.
The resulting restriction patterns were interpreted using the criteria proposed by Tenover et al. [ 37] and our recent study [ 31].
The X-ray diffraction patterns were interpreted using the conventional procedures [24].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com