For the co-current flow pattern, results showed that the cross flow model was the best, followed by the plug flow model with some slight differences.
For this kind of pattern, results show that for the bracing angle of 75.96° and higher, buildings stiffness is not varying in a regular path with the further increase of bracing angle.
The binding pattern results show the same trend.
The antibiotic susceptibility pattern results showed the level of resistance to be ampicillin 100% in all the three sites, pefloxacin 90.9%, 72.2%, 66.7%, ceftriaxone 69.7%, 72.2%, 70.8%, gentamicin 54.5%, 52.8%, 37.5%, and ciprofloxacin 51.5%, 47.2%, 35.4% at the wound, skin, and bed sites, respectively.
It is interesting to note that at the low density, Nmax = 5 fits almost 3 times more emitters than Nmax = 1 case, and thus the pattern result shows a better resolved structure near the center and provides better resolution compared to Nmax = 1 fitting result.
With regard to activity patterns, results showed a U-shaped relationship between ideal-other self-discrepancies and persistence behavior and a positive relationship between feared-own self-discrepancies and avoidance behavior.
Patterning results showed the resolution of the resist to be 28 nm at an EUV exposure dose of 12.2 mJ/cm2, the obtainable aspect ratio to be as high as 2, and the line-edge roughness (LER) to be small, with 3σ being 3.6 nm for 45-nm line-and-space patterns and an inspection length, L, of 2000 nm.
The results suggest that the dynamics of the response convergence (the pattern of results shown in Fig. 4) changed over the course of the recording sessions.
Taken together, this pattern of results showing a stable transient ERP shape, seems more compatible with the above superposition scenario than with the existence of local entrainment in the jitter sequences (see Fig. 9D, 10C).
