Suggestions(1)
Similar(60)
In this part we propose to derive asymptotic developments for pattern p-values from their recursive expressions.
This association was even stronger for postmenopausal women, also showing a marked dose-response pattern (P-value for trend < 0.001).
When using the flavonoid genes CHS, DFR, F3H and LDOX, 208 genes (regulon 2) showed a matching expression pattern (P-value 0.01).
172 out of the 519 genes down-regulated in ams were expressed significantly higher in the wild type anther than the inflorescence, while 102 of the 849 up-regulated genes showed this pattern (P-value < 0.05, Figure 1D, Additional file 2), suggesting that preferential anther expression contributed to the difference between the two studies.
The number of putative microRNA targets (19 of 177 genes) in the temporal down-pattern was significantly lower than the number of targets (155 of 463 genes) in the temporal up-pattern (p value < 0.001).
A Students T-test was used to compare OMS values of the complete datasets (N = 75) to determine statistical significance: this confirmed that enaGC1 mildly enhanced cindrRNAi mis-patterning (p-value = 0.02438, significant at the 5% level).
Additionally, the expression level of Rafflesia VGTs is positively correlated with similarity to Vitis-like coding patterns (p-value = 1.4×10−7), suggesting that the convergent host-like coding patterns we identify in some Rafflesia VGTs are biologically meaningful.
Fourthly, the FV pattern had P values less than 0.05 but higher than 0.01 in certain subjects.
a 1 kb up and downstream of TSS overlapping EIs; b Enrichment compared to random patterns; c p values calculated by 1,000 permutations.
The low p-distance region in rhesus monkeys, chimpanzees, and humans shows some species-specific patterns of p values, suggesting that the timing of gene conversion between X and Y chromosomes is species-specific in each of the lineages leading to the three species.
This indicates that microRNA is especially concentrated in the regulation of temporal up-pattern genes (p value < 0.001).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com