Suggestions(1)
Exact(5)
Clustering of gene expression pattern of wild type, eed1Δ and eed1Δ + pTET-UME6 cells showed that wild type and eed1Δ + pTET-UME6 gene expression pattern clustered together (Fig. 6A), a result which reflected the observed similar morphologies (Fig. 5).
It could be seen that under iron replete conditions (Fig. 9, B1) the growth pattern of wild type strain (mc2155) was significantly better than the knockout strain (mc2155▵6554) which, however, was restored to a level similar to the wild type upon transformation with pMtb1348.
Standard gel electrophoretic analyses showed no major changes in the protein band pattern of wild type versus dystrophic preparations (Fig. 5a, f, i).
We also observed no differences when we compared the pattern of wild type cells differentiation with transductants differentiation (data not shown).
We also examined the expression pattern of wild type IDH1 (WT-IDH1) in control brain samples and WT-IDH1 is largely detected in neurons and microglia/macrophages (Fig. 2).
Similar(55)
At P3 and P7, genome-wide expression patterns of wild type and α9−/− samples clustered together.
Expression patterns of wild type and mutant caspase-1 as well as ASC in HEK293 cells were confirmed by immunoblot.
BGI/Yale array data showing relative expression levels to suspension cultured cells, sequential expression patterns of wild type anthers relative to palea/lemma, and Affymetrix data comparing stress-treated targets to untreated reference are also used to check gene expression patterns in other conditions (Table S9).
Of these, almost all (more than 80%) restored the actin filament pattern characteristic of wild type cells (Figure 6A).
On the other hand, the cXackatE strain exhibited the same pattern of wild-type cells but with higher activity values.
To quantify these findings, the number of cells containing detectable aggregates or showing a dispersed pattern of wild-type protein localisation was determined following shR-P16 treatment and compared to that seen with the non-specific control (Figure 5C).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com