Sentence examples for pattern of argumentation from inspiring English sources

Moreover, only one of the arguments against plurality elsewhere reported, the antinomy of limited and unlimited, conforms to the pattern of argumentation exemplified in the antinomy of like and unlike described by Plato's Socrates (see below, 2.1.1).

It uses a general pattern of argumentation (logos) that makes an inference from certain alleged facts about the world (cosmos) to the existence of a unique being, generally identified with or referred to as God.

The development of a basic logical vocabulary for such contests indicates some reflection upon the patterns of argumentation.

Upon examining the actual arguments respected figures wielded against the Civil Rights Act during the 1960s, certain patterns of argumentation become almost immediately apparent.

Such beneficence-based arguments are common patterns of moral argumentation about new and emerging science and technologies, but they risk to uncritically accept scientists' assumptions.

This is a notable example of a pattern of straw-man argumentation that has characterized your entire effort to discredit my commentary.

It might also suggest that these arguments took the form of antinomies like the one Socrates specifically cites, so that the general pattern of Zeno's argumentation would have been: if there are many things, these must be both F and not-F; but things cannot be both F and not-F; therefore, it cannot be the case that there are many things.

This was a notably early attempt to clean up the Internet — occurring at Stanford, no less, the epicenter of Silicon Valley — and the reactions to it established a pattern of toxic rhetoric and hypocritical argumentation that, nearly three decades later, remains discouragingly familiar.

This was a notably early attempt to clean up the Internet occurring at Stanford, no less, the epicenter of Silicon Valley and the reactions to it established a pattern of toxic rhetoric and hypocritical argumentation that, nearly three decades later, remains discouragingly familiar.

His latest two-volume work, Everyday Arguments and the Theory of Argumentation, was published last year.

This line of argumentation is called an indispensability argument (Colyvan 2001).