where ES[k, n] is the unsmeared excitation pattern formulated in Equation (12).
This distribution of the direct additive variance followed the pattern described in Equation (2) and was exploited in the model proposed by Neugenbauer et al. [ 18, 19] in order to detect paternal and maternal inherited effects.
In order to generate the 2D pattern ρ φ,f0) in Equation 13, the DOA values were analyzed from 0° to 180° with an interval of 1°, where 90° is perpendicular to the microphone axis (cf. Figure 3), and pitch frequencies were analyzed from 70 to 280 Hz with an interval of 1 Hz.
The excitation pattern, E[k, n], shown in Equation (13) is calculated as E [ k, n ] = max Ē ( k, n ), E s ( k, n ), (14).
This opposition between forward and back reactions was one of the first specific mechanisms of classical chemical kinetics to produce the Hill equation pattern in the absence direct multiplicative interactions that amplify the input signal [ 14].
Reordering the rows in Equation (4) to follow Karigl's pattern [ 4], both formulae only differ on the right hand side.
Furthermore, as shown in equation (2), the weights of these patterns quantify the changes in each gene expression level between any two stages.
But May's hopes of achieving the target are also jeopardised by the second part of the net migration equation – the recent pattern in emigration which is now at its lowest level since 2001.
This new measure is named SMSR, from Scaling MSR, and it is shown in equation 3. Nevertheless, SMSR is not capable of identifying shifting patterns.
The spatial patterns of saturated firing rates will generally depend on which neurons are driven and how much (Ii, in equation 1).
