Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Characteristics of the patients were compared with the cells obtained.
After exclusion of nine patients, 387 evaluable patients were compared between S-HAM [n = 203 (52%)] and standard double induction [n = 184 (48%)] (Fig. 2).
These patients were compared with control patients with a similar degree of renal dysfunction in whom biopsies showed chronic rejection without transplant glomerulopathy.
Preeclamptic and normotensive patients were compared to assess the predictive value of TNF-α in preeclampsia.
Seventy-three DSM-IV bipatientstients were compared to 63 healthy individuals using the TCI.
In addition, five-year outcomes (known for 52 patients) were compared in these two subgroups.
These patients were compared with 90 healthy, age- and sex-matched controls.
Two groups of patients were compared.
Patients were compared with 196 healthy controls.
Two groups of resuscitated patients were compared.
Patients were compared with historic controls treated with the identical HDC and bone marrow support regimen.
More suggestions(15)
parents were compared
recipients were compared
participants were compared
practitioners were compared
adolescents were compared
hospitalizations were compared
clinics were compared
clients were compared
medications were compared
patients were evacuated
patients were rounded
patients were treated
patients were studied
patients were left
patients were hospitalized
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com