Exact(59)
Patients viewed surgeons who designed products more favorably than those who are consultants (P = 0.03).
They recorded the activity of 200 single amygdala neurons and determined how they responded while the patients viewed photographs of happy and fearful faces.
Patients viewed the diary as a therapeutic tool while relatives considered it as an information sharing mechanism, including as a mechanism to demonstrate to the patient 'how sick he really was' and 'what he put us through'.
All patients viewed their MMR result by ePHR at home.
Most patients viewed the material favourably, particularly the recovery stores.
Patients viewed the eye chart at a distance of 3 meters.
Some patients viewed the healthcare professionals as the key actors in the handover process.
Words and pseudowords were presented auditorily in a passive-listening MMNm oddball design, whilst patients viewed a silent film.
These patients viewed 3 modules on average (range: 1 12 modules; 25th percentile = 1 module, 75th percentile = 4 modules).
Patients viewed the consultation aspect of the visit as a chance to receive 'reassurance' regarding their condition and progress.
Similar(1)
So why not get some guidance as to how patients view their encounters with various doctors?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com