Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(24)
This study was focused on outcomes among those alive at 12 months, and because of the random selection of patients, there were no major differences in the 628 patients selected for the study and the other 1152 who were alive at 12 months and not selected for the study (data not shown).
A third school of thought supposes that there may have been a problem with the mixture of patients selected for the study.The NHLBI will not publish the results of its investigation for another six to eight weeks, but Dr Nabel has told The Economist that her team has ruled out several of the speculations.
Out of total 100 patients selected for the study, a total of 72 patients were BSI positive.
Patients selected for the study satisfied the compliance criteria of wearing aligners and class II elastics at least 22 h per day as recommended by Align Technology with regular 6-week monitoring for encouragement.
Patients selected for the study presented complete follow-up data and uniform methodology for hormone receptor content determination.
In addition, the fact that late-EPCs harbor moderate amounts of viral genomes in unstimulated conditions may be partly related to the type of KS patients selected for the study.
Similar(36)
These conflicting results may be related to different scoring systems used, different definitions of overexpression, the use of different antibodies, antigen retrieval techniques and the heterogeneous populations of patients selected for the studies.
The median age at onset for the 40 patients selected for the sequencing study was 48 years.
Patients selected for the present study had tumors involving local lymph nodes but without distant metastasis (stage C) but not including any with frank tumor in a proximal, distal, circumferential or deep line of resection.
Patients selected for the present retrospective study fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: (1) female patients diagnosed with ipsilateral invasive breast cancer.
The reason for these differences may be due to the differences in the clinical characteristics of the patients selected for this study.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com