Sentence examples for paths were significantly from inspiring English sources

The crack propagating paths were significantly changed and the cracks length was visibly prolonged through crack deflection and crack blunting.

The test revealed that both gene sets formed non-random networks and had a strong tendency to form clusters, as their shortest paths were significantly different from that of random networks and clustering coefficients were significantly higher than the corresponding random networks (P values  = 0, no any random network outperformed the observed SZ- or cancer-specific network).

Standardized regression weights were mostly 0.27-0.60, all all covariance paths were significantly different from zero.

The difference test revealed that the paths were significantly different in magnitude (p < 0.01), thereby providing additional evidence of the discriminant validity of the PQLI.

In relation to hypothesis 4, two incivility paths were significantly related to negative outcomes, experienced incivility from coworker (β = −.192, p <.001) and witnessed incivility from superiors (β = −.199, p <.001).

The direct and indirect paths were significantly different (b (SE) = .628 (.039), p < .001), indicating that regular physical activity moderated the direct path between maternal and offspring anxiety/depression but not the indirect paths between maternal and offspring anxiety/depression via offspring self-esteem.

In addition, the power consumption for the source-destination paths is significantly increased.

For most gases at room temperature, their mean-free paths are significantly larger than the pore size of our CNT membranes.

Lava flow paths are significantly affected by the large variability in possible lava flow volumes, lava flow lengths, and complex topography.

It is obvious that the state-evolving paths are significantly altered by reprogramming perturbations and some nodes act as converging transition states (see below).

A Mantel test [ 54] comparing the distances among the different strains with respect to pathogenicity was used to assess whether distances among groups (PATH vs NON-PATH) were significantly larger than those within groups (PATH vs. PATH and NON-PATH vs. NON-PATH).