Sentence examples for patents variables from inspiring English sources

The interdependence between the startups and patents variables provides a typical example of commensalism (Fig. 2).

On the contrary, the startups variable serves as an input factor for the products, FRs, and patents variables.

Furthermore, the patents variable appears to be strongly associated with C1 and not with the OPP.

Another example of knowledge specificity occurs when the patents variable has competition with respect to URs (Fig. 2).

The patents variable substitutes for specialized knowledge required for URs, who increase the uniqueness of this knowledge.

In the final section, we will again discuss the reasons why the patents variable has a negative effect on the URs variable.

Given that the knowledge specificity of the patents variable overlaps with that of the URs variable, new patents in the UBG alliances may substitute for the role played by the URs.

Simultaneously, it is noted that, based on the regression of the number of patents variable on OPP, the partial F-statistic is estimated at 3.41 (F-stat < 10) and the partial R2 is equal to 8% thus, it is regarded as exogenous to OPP.

In a study by Nicholls-Nixon and Woo, using data from the US pharmaceutical industry participation as a member of a joint venture demonstrated negative and statistically significant results for both knowledge creation variables, patents filed, and patents granted.

The startups variable had a positive effect on products, FRs, patents, and URs variables so that the startups variable could outweigh the negative effects among products-FRs and patents-URs variables shown in Fig. 1.

Table 7 Knowledge creation/knowledge dissemination Independent variable Dependent variable   Patents granted Patents filed Publications Conferences University −0.5052 (0.2827) −0.1155 (0.2561) 0.3613 (0.2625) 0.4097 (0.2539) Adv.