Sentence examples for patent submitted from inspiring English sources
A patent submitted by the company this month reveals that it is working on technology that will enable brands to target shoppers with specific products informed by their Facebook activity and facial expressions.
The patent, submitted in 1997, relates to a way of creating image previews.
Dr. Berkovic was a consultant to Bionomics and Athena diagnostics over 4 years ago issued, and a patent submitted by University of Melbourne for DEPDC5 testing pending.
The F.D.A. says it has neither the resources nor the expertise to review patents submitted by brand-name companies.
Other patents submitted by the company have focused on how it could suggest products to people based on keywords in their conversations.
As surrogate measures of scientific productivity, we tallied the number of disease-specific patents submitted [24] and articles published and listed in PubMed [25] in the 10 medical journals with the highest impact factor scores using key word searches [26].
SED and RDW have patents submitted on molecular pathogen diagnostic methods.
The intent of the these amendments was to exempt ("grandfather") patents submitted for listing that were in conformity with the pre-2006 rules from coming under the 2006 changes.
J. Q. T. may accrue revenue in the future on patents submitted by the University of Pennsylvania wherein he is co-inventor and he received revenue from the sale of Avid to Eli Lily as co-inventor on imaging related patents submitted by the University of Pennsylvania; and is the William Maul Measey-Truman G. Schnabel, Jr., M.D. Professor of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology.
Dr. Trojanowski may accrue revenue in the future on patents submitted by the University of Pennsylvania wherein he is co-Inventor and he received revenue from the sale of Avid to Eli Lily as co-inventor on imaging related patents submitted by the University of Pennsylvania while he receives research support from the NIH, Bristol Myer Squib, AstraZeneca and several non-profits.
The Federal Court ruling was seen as undermining that protection and as a consequence there was a concern that many patents submitted in full compliance with the listing requirements, as they were interpreted and applied prior to June 17, 2006, could be deleted from, or not added to, the Patent Register.
