Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
I am particularly offended by his remark "Let Democrats be the party of security, defending the 20th-century welfare state".
Mr. Brooks envisions a new Republican "party of work," striking a new way forward, letting "Democrats be the party of security, defending the 20th-century welfare state".
Don't get hung up on whether the federal government is 20 percent or 22 percent of G.D.P. Let Democrats be the party of security, defending the 20th-century welfare state.
Cameron informs us that the reason for such largesse is because the Tories are the party of "security" and the dream of the feted "property owning democracy".
Similar(56)
Democrats can justly portray themselves as the party of economic security, the party that created Social Security and Medicare and defended those programs against Republican attacks — and the party that can bring assured health coverage to all Americans.
The Republicans like to claim that they are the party of national security.
One party becomes the party of economic security and the other becomes the party of creative destruction.
No, they are trying to remind listeners of the last time the Democrats were considered the party of national security.
Doubts were downplayed in public, as part of a tactic of painting Republicans as the party of national security and Democrats as soft on terror.
But it also showed the Tories narrowly leading on the issue of terrorism, suggesting that their reputation as the party of national security, as well as their support for alternatives to 42 days (such as post-charge questioning and the use of intercept evidence), shields them from taunts of weakness.
It seems awfully unlikely that in the first presidential election since 9/11, against a president who has spent most of his administration carefully cultivating and reinforcing his role as commander in chief, the Democrats can regain the status as the party of national security, which they lost during the Vietnam War.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com