Sentence examples for parturiency from inspiring English sources

We established the following prediction: movement described by <3 df in GAMs would depict non-parturiency whereas movement described by ≥3 df would depict parturiency.

Generalized additive models predicted maternal status (parturiency) correctly 93% of the time based on movement.

Maternal status was evident in elk movement with our application of GAMs correctly predicting parturiency 93% of the time.

We applied results from PSPB and field observation of female elk in 2008 and 2009 to test the GAM approach, in which movement patterns parameterized by <3df were predicted to depict non-parturiency whereas movement patterns parameterized by ≥3 df were predicted to depict parturiency.

Here, both parturient and non-parturient elk were examined inside the gas field where any behavior distinctly associated with parturiency was obscured by apparent risk-aversive behavior related to human activity during the day time.

We successfully integrated GAMs, field observation, and random-effects RSF modeling to designate parturiency, describe individual and population-level resource selection, and determine the relative influence of maternal status and human activity on the reliability of spatially explicit models intended to guide conservation of critical ungulate calving resources.

We asked: 1) what are the relative influences of maternal status (parturiency) and human activity on resource selection, 2) to what extent does behavior vary among individuals, 3) how does individual variation interact with human activity, and 4) how can our findings be applied in conservation planning and decision making?

This was the basis for using GAMs to designate parturiency based on movement; our thinking was that ungulate behavior contains information on reproductive status and GAMs would reveal a difference in the shape and relative complexity of the response curve between parturient and non-parturient females.

Here, responses to human activity were more apparent than differences in resource selection as a function of parturiency with elk exhibiting a clear spatiotemporal avoidance of human activity at the population-level and modified patterns of selection for environmental features, notably security cover and elevation, in developed areas relative to undeveloped areas.

Determining non-parturiency is never definitive; however, we designated females as non-parturient with negative PSPB results and for which field observation was unable to associate the female with a calf [13].