Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
Nanoparticle biodistribution, at single particle resolution, is studied by transmission electron microscopy.
Cell and particle resolution dependence of simulation metrics are presented and global uncertainties assigned.
Overall SPH was determined to be a good choice for modelling surface and structure interactions and we provide guidelines on appropriate particle resolution for such interactions.
We have been able to observe with single particle resolution the interface between two structural symmetries that cannot be interconnected by a continuous transition.
Model predictions are generally in good agreement with the velocity, liquid volume flow rate and mean temperature data and are shown to have a low sensitivity to the sparse stochastic particle resolution.
Thanks to the combination of APR and δ+-SPH especially in three dimensional (3D) cases, the overall computational cost is significantly reduced while sufficiently fine particle resolution can be obtained in the flow region characterized by large pressure gradient close to the structure surface.
Similar(54)
We show here that SPH is capable of achieving accurate predictions of the buoy's motion when interacting with the free surface with appropriate particle resolutions.
In addition, the particles' resolution was shown with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (CM30 300 kV, Berlin, Germany).
A suspended microchannel resonator (Archimedes, Affinity Biosensors LLC) was used for size characterization of the fractionated phosphors at single-particle resolution with low-femtogram sensitivity.
Resistive-pulse sensing with nanopores detects MDa-sized biomolecules with single-particle resolution and can be used to understand population heterogeneity.
The effect of particle number (resolution), compressibility (Mach number) and outflow boundary condition (length of the domain) on the solution are considered.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com