Sentence examples for participation compared to from inspiring English sources

Thus, those participants in contexts where participation was included as part of the overall assessment rubric were significantly less likely to get the highest scores for participation, compared to participants in the control group, for whom participation was not included in the assessment criteria, but was measured covertly.

There was no difference in the proportion of men or mean age of patients who declined participation compared to participants (data not shown).

This is supported by the results of a multicenter study of hypertension and genetics, in which no female participants enrolled in the US solicited the advice of a partner before participation, compared to 47% of female participants enrolled in Nigeria that solicited the advice of their partner prior to participating in the trial [ 7].

Parents reported their children who participated used more safety strategies immediately and 6 months after participation compared to pre-intervention.

Feasibility was determined by the acceptance (families that were approached for participation compared to the number that consented) and the number who actually participated in a home visit.

Gao et al. [64] reported that rewarding participants according to their actual contributions is more likely to result in increased participation compared to a strategy that pays a blanket amount to all data contributors.

Participation rates of patients with and without choice of participation mode did not differ (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.74 – 1.28); 65% of patients who choose their preferred participation mode actually participated, compared to 66% of patients who were not allowed to choose participation mode (X 0.03 (1), p = .853).853

In trial 1, more patients were initially willing to participate in the network study when allowed to choose a participation mode compared to patients invited for an interview (RR 2.72, 95%CI: 1.67 – 4.42) ; 90% of patients allowed to choose their preferred participation mode were willing to participate, compared to 73% patients invited to participate in an interview.

Some of our results are in accordance with those of Denniston et al. [ 6] who considered conditional participation rate and found, although not significant, higher conditional participation rates for choice of participation mode compared to no-choice participation in interviews and questionnaires.

Offering choice of participation mode had benefit on participation rates compared to invitations to participate in questionnaires, but not when compared to invitations to participate in telephone interviews.

Assuming that providing choice of mode will retain patients who are lost when a single provided mode is provided, we will test the following hypothesis: H1: Participation rates will be higher when potential participants are provided with choice of participation mode, compared to those of patients provided with only one participation mode.