Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Fig. 13 Optimal participated number under different volunteered EVs.
The following German centers participated (number of patients contributed): Dr. Dorsch, Kronach (14), Dr. Fischer, Darmstadt (22), Dr. Frank, München (3), Dr. Pistrosch, Hoyerswerda (18), Dr. Ries, Flensburg (6), Dr. Wilbrandt, Heringen (17), Dr. Morgenroth, Elsenfeld (18), Dr. Mertens, Magdeburg (5), Dr. Frye, Münster (6).
Similar(58)
Even if the participating number of women after the restriction period gradually increased during the 1980s, they are still in 2010 underrepresented (1∶10 of the participants).
Clinics were selected based on willingness to participate, number of patients, and similar clinical routines.
The number of EC consultations, number invited to participate, number who accepted, number who refused and number who completed the chlamydia test were recorded.
Therefore, the overall estimated participation rate for the patients was 61.4 % (number of participating patients/estimated number of eligible patients).
A record will be kept of the number of invitations to participate, the number of potential participants who volunteer to participate, and the number of screened patients who are ineligible and the reason for their ineligibility.
A record will be kept of the number of invitations to participate, the number of potential subjects who volunteer to participate, and the number of screened patients who are ineligible and the reason for their ineligibility.
Assuming that increasing EVs volunteer into this procedure, optimal discharging-participate number obtaining from (15) with increased gmax is shown in Fig. 13.
The number of people invited to participate, the number of potential subjects willing to participate, and the number of eligible people will be recorded, as will the reasons for ineligibility.
Recruiting GPs will record the number of patients who are invited to participate, the number who decline to participate, and the number of screened patients who are ineligible and their reasons for declining participation or ineligibility.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com