Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
participated children
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "participated children" is not correct in English and does not convey a clear meaning.
It seems to be an attempt to describe children who have taken part in an activity, but it lacks proper grammatical structure. Example: "The participated children in the event were excited to share their experiences." (This should be rephrased for clarity.)
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(2)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
The guardians of all participated children provided written informed consent.
At 6 years of age, 194 children (80%) participated; children and parents not participating either moved or could not be located, declined participation or repeatedly missed appointments, or the child had died before this assessment.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
Written, informed consent was obtained from adult participants and the parents or guardians of participating children.
Science
Nationwide at any given time, there are five teams, for a total of 10,000 participating children.
News & Media
344, rmanyc.org; $10 for participating children; $5 for members' children; free for accompanying adults (includes museum admission).
News & Media
But the contents are actually the creme de la creme of the work created by participating children.
News & Media
Fig. 1 Flowchart of the participating children and adolescents.
The average age of the participating children at the first measurement point was 34 months.
The class teachers of the participating children are asked to complete a questionnaire as well.
We hypothesised that participating children would reduce their risk of obesity compared with those not yet having taken part.
Science
Further, in Study 2, the different types of preschool programs attended by participating children were directly observed.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use "participating children" instead of "participated children". The present participle correctly modifies the noun.
Common error
Avoid using the past tense "participated" as an adjective. It is grammatically incorrect. Instead, use the present participle "participating" or rephrase the sentence.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
2.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "participated children" attempts to function as a noun phrase where "participated" modifies "children". However, Ludwig AI indicates that it is not grammatically correct. The correct form is using "participating" as an adjective.
Frequent in
Science
60%
News & Media
20%
Formal & Business
20%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "participated children" is grammatically incorrect. The proper way to describe children who have taken part in something is to use "participating children", where "participating" acts as an adjective. Ludwig AI flags the original phrase as incorrect. The phrase attempts to function as a noun phrase, but the past tense usage is inappropriate. When writing, always use "participating" to correctly modify "children" and ensure grammatical accuracy. While various sources like Science, News & Media, and Formal & Business might contain the incorrect phrase, it does not make it grammatically acceptable.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
participating children
Replaces the past tense "participated" with the present participle "participating" to correctly function as an adjective.
children who participated
Uses a relative clause to specify children involved in something, clarifying the grammatical structure.
involved children
Uses "involved" as an adjective to describe children taking part in an activity.
children taking part
Employs a verb phrase to indicate children's engagement in an activity.
children in the study
Specifies children within a research context.
children enrolled
Describes children registered or included in a program or study.
engaged children
Refers to children actively involved or interested in an activity.
children attending
Indicates children present at or participating in an event or program.
active children
Highlights children who are actively participating or involved.
children contributing
Focuses on children making a contribution to an activity or study.
FAQs
What is the correct way to say "participated children"?
The correct phrase is "participating children". The word "participating" acts as an adjective, correctly modifying the noun "children".
Is "participated children" grammatically correct?
No, "participated children" is not grammatically correct. The past tense "participated" should not be used as an adjective. The correct form is "participating children".
What can I say instead of "participated children"?
You can use "participating children", "children who participated", or "involved children".
What's the difference between "participated children" and "participating children"?
"Participated children" is grammatically incorrect because it uses the past tense as an adjective. "Participating children" is the correct form, where "participating" is a present participle used as an adjective.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
2.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested