Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Participants asked to participate representative for population from which they were recruited?; 12. Participants prepared to participate representative for population from which they were recruited?; 13. staff, places, and facilities where the participants were treated representative of the treatment the majority of participants receive?; items 14 20 Internal validity (bias) – 14.
Similar(59)
Although the percentage of women that participated is representative for the percentage of women that worked in this age group, the number was too small to draw conclusions on the effectiveness of the intervention.
Nonetheless, the participating sample were representative for age, gender and rural/urban distribution of Lithuania's population.
Age, gender and geographic distribution of the participating GPs are representative for Belgium.
The participating GPs were representative for all Dutch GPs regarding age.
The participating PCPs were representative for Dutch PCPs with respect to age, gender and location in deprived areas.
*multiple linear regression analysis; standardised beta coefficient; 95%CI; n = 163 GPs The 163 participating GPs were representative for the total population of GPs in the Netherlands.
The participating GPs were representative for the Dutch GP population on age, sex, part-time/fulltime working, urbanisation level, and region.
aWhile in most participating countries, samples representative for the whole country were sampled, however for feasibility reasons in Germany only the biggest state North Rhine Westphalia took part in the study!
The participating practices are representative for primary care in Germany concerning the number of single-handed practices, location, the full time equivalent or the number of physicians per practice.
The participating GPs were representative for Dutch GPs and practices with respect to age, gender and location in deprived areas, however, single-handed practices were underrepresented (32% instead of 44% nation wide).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com