Sentence examples for participants the differences from inspiring English sources

Despite substantial variations between the participants, the differences are statistically significant (Friedman test P = 0.01).

Their rate was not only high in the non-participating groups but also in the participating groups, with a percentage of 36% (n = 15) in complete participants; the difference between the groups was therefore not significant.

Fourth, across participants the difference between the subjective duration of repeated and novel items was related to the accuracy of discrimination.

In 16 (out of 20) participants the difference in SCRs between very unexpected and expected chords was larger for the expressive than for the non-expressive chords, but only 9 participants showed this effect of expression for the difference between unexpected (original) and expected chords.

For some participants the difference in learning opportunities and standards was problematic.

Around 95% of the differences were between -10.0 and +6.8; for 29.4% of the participants, the difference between paired MMSE scores was 5 or more.

Although medication use was less for all three risk factor categories for ILI compared with DSE participants, the difference was most pronounced for diabetes medications.

As a whole, despite higher serum ferritin levels in patients with OA than in healthy control participants, the difference is not statistically significant (Table  3).

Mandatory quarantine for volunteers returning from aid missions in West Africa was supported by 37.6% of participants; the difference between those worried about EVD (51.6%) and those not worried (31.9%) was significant (p<0.001).

Among the allergic participants, the difference between the current smokers and non-smokers was close to significant (p=0.06); although values in the ex-smokers cannot be compared because of the small size of the subgroup (only 3 participants), they were similar to those of the smokers (figure 2).

Even when the focus group leaders reminded participants that the differences between proposed options were nearly negligible, participants continued to choose the more expensive options as if it were beyond question that they must be more efficacious or foolproof.