Sentence examples for participants ls from inspiring English sources

Insulin dose was significantly lower in exenatide participants with baseline BMI 30 36 and >36 kg/m compared with placebo participants (LS mean difference, −9.2 and −12.2 units, respectively; P < 0.05).

Across baseline BMI tertiles (<30, 30 36, and >36 kg/m), greater weight loss was observed in exenatide participants compared with placebo participants (LS mean difference, −1.5, −2.9, and −3.0 kg, respectively; P < 0.05) (Fig. 1).

change 0.51 (0.10) and 0.79 (0.10) kg, respectively, in the pooled analysis of EDITION 1, 2 and 3], but with less weight gain in Gla-300 treated participants (LS mean difference −0.28, 95% CI −0.55 to −0.01; p = 0.039; Figure 1D).

Three volunteers were taking prescribed medication (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in two participants, l-thyroxine in one participant) and medication was constant throughout their participation in the study.

This is since participants l(B) operated 2(D) with collision alarms in the first trial and losing the collision alarms could result increasing the number of collisions in the second trial.

From the tests summary table, r2 as the proportion of true variance (SSregression/SStotal) is calculated and used to calculate L using the Equation (N = number of participants): L = (N − 1 ) ∗ r ² The L-statistic is then compared to Χ2 with pq-degrees of freedom (p = number of independent variables, q = number of dependent variables).

The mean and the standard deviation of measurements without participant l(B) are listed in Table 8.

Every series in (24) represents the revenue change of participant l with a strategy varied while those of other participants are invariant.

We evaluated the measurements of participant l(B) as to whether they differed from the mean of five other participants by using a t-test.

Participant l(B) took a long time to operate the robot in trial 2(Z) in the criterion 'time' in Figure 24(a).

Travelling time in trial 2(Z) was much longer and the number of collisions in trial 2(Z) was more for participant l(B) than those for the other five participants.