Likewise, no participant voiced concerns about the way that program benefits appeared unrelated to surrounding research, until this issue was specifically probed during interviews.
Measures were taken to ensure rigour, including fidelity to participant voices and language use; team meetings to reflect on results' believability; audit trails to track research decisions; and self-criticism by researchers (Milne and Oberle 2005; Patton 2002).
One participant voiced concern about deforestation in some areas resulting in difficulties sourcing some plant species.
Nearly every participant voiced a willingness to be a "medical guinea pig" by taking novel experimental therapies for IPF.
One participant voiced the concern that "once you incentivise it [diabetes management] other things that you can't incentivise get lost or diminished in the process".
Another participant voiced a similar concern stating that the backlog in product review is, in essence, preventing companies from launching novel products on the Canadian market.
Review of open-ended text with text-mining tools such as LSA is critical to allow participant voices to truly be heard, from within the bounds of large-scale epidemiologic survey studies.
It is also important to recognize that older participants voice as motivating factors for study participation as the ability to provide societal benefit by participation, availability of home visits, compensation, and provision of transportation (Jefferson et al).
This article explores which aspects of care that older people in LTC facilities want to improve, by means of a collective policy agenda-setting project, during which the participants voice their own experiences and concerns regarding LTC.
Confirmability is demonstrated via the use of verbatim quotes to provide the participants voice, rather than purely the researchers interpretations of the data [ 19].
