Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Considering the average RTs that were measured from participant task completion and the similar recognition rates for authentic and play-acted stimuli, it is unlikely that any differences in activation were due to variability in participant concentration level or stimulus difficulty.
Similar(59)
The overall reduction in positive affect might not suggest a lack of motivation on the part of the participants, as participant task-related accuracy was over 90%%, including the trials where correct response patterns were not yet known.
For each participant, task-specific effects were estimated using a general linear model (modeled as a box-car function convolved with the canonical homodynamic response function).
Participants' task performance, cervical spine biomechanics and upper extremity muscle activities were recorded and compared.
The participants' task was to indicate whether the square had changed color using the "F" (same) or "J" (different) key.
The participants' task is to make pairwise comparisons of preference between specific realizations of each product group.
The participants' task was to indicate which stimulus was presented first (Experiment 1) or second (Experiment 2).
Participants' task was made relative to a spatiotemporal reference frame randomly intermixed to maintain both temporal and spatial layout in participants' mind.
The authors concluded that CHEX was superior to other tools as it supported both the detection and the identification components of the participants' task.
The participants' task was simply to listen carefully to each of the stimuli and specify afterwards which word they had heard at the ends of the question sentences.
Participants' task was to view the photos and categorize them as sexually interested, provocatively dressed; sexually interested, conservatively dressed; friendly, provocatively dressed; and friendly, conservatively dressed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com