Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Participant feedback revealed a positive attitude toward annotations.
However, integrating participant feedback into current science, research, and decision-making processes is challenging.
Participant feedback could not be ascertained in the SMR due to its secondary nature.
Participant feedback and observations were collated to direct future departmental training.
Participant feedback indicates players are split between wanting to run their own business and leaving it to the pros.
However, the participant feedback highlights issues with recovering from a failed reconfiguration or a reconfiguration triggered by mistake.
Three cycles of participant feedback and feedback from counselling centre staff was coded and used to iteratively modify the interface.
Open-ended participant feedback was uniformly satisfactory, and all participants were able to complete the decision aid.
Three main actions were proposed by the steering committee based on round 1 results and participant feedback.
Assessment of participant feedback reveals that an exploration phase is effective in helping understand a problem and prepare for multiple criteria evaluation (MCE).
Despite achieving consensus on terminology and definitions, the steering committee nonetheless recommended a number of minor revisions for consideration based on written participant feedback.
More suggestions(15)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com